by:

Posted & filed under Arts & Entertainment.

Let me be straight with you: I am moving up in the world.

Three weeks ago, I found this in my inbox:

MEDIA PREVIEW
PICASSO BLACK AND WHITE
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2012

9 am–12 pm (note early start time)
Light breakfast: 9–9:30 am
Remarks: 9:30 am
Exhibition viewing: 10 am–12 pm

Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum
1071 Fifth Avenue (at 89th Street)
New York City

There’s nothing a cultural critic enjoys more than fresh content and free mini-croissants handed to her on a tiny paper plate. I RSVP’d immediately.

Walking to the Guggenheim on a Thursday morning in fall is a glorious thing, what with the ghosts of Jackie O. and Brooke Astor and Edith Wharton swirling about with the autumn leaves. It is a far cry from midtown (my usual Thursday morning spot), where scores of carts sell shitty bagels and throngs of people shove each other to buy them. On the Upper East Side, however (once you manage to get past the big box stores around 86th & Lex), you really can disassociate from the grind. Ambling down quiet streets with well-kept flower boxes, I passed turn-of-the-century mansions and children in pleated skirts and bow ties before arriving at Frank Lloyd Wright’s strange temple of whimsy: the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum.

Heeding my sister’s advice that I start dressing better (since I am moving up in the world and all), I had donned a capped-sleeve pencil dress that she picked out for me at H & M. Inside the museum, the vast majority of other “media types” were dressed like Lena Dunham on Girls. It was a room of quirky young gallerist types in ankle socks and booties offset by quirky old gallerist types (the tastemakers of an earlier generation), two of whom were sporting berets and one who was successfully pulling off a black demi-veil with turquoise feathers.

Also thrown into this mix were the cater-waiters, uniformed in navy jackets of the Starship Enterprise variety. I recognized the jackets immediately, not because I’m a Star Trek fan (I am not), but because I used to own one. Those jackets put everything into perspective: the last (and quite frankly only) time I’d been to the Guggenheim before was as a Restaurant Associates employee, hired to pass hors d’oeuvres at an event not unlike the one at hand. I’d found my people.

During the “remarks” portion of the event, directors and executives gave thanks for everyone’s hard work, and then the primary curator spoke at length. Unfortunately, due to her heavily accented English, I couldn’t make out much of her speech. One bit, however, was clear: It is extraordinary, she said, to have an exhibit so devoted to line and shape in a building that is so devoted to line and shape. I was instantly skeptical. What art exhibit isn’t in some way devoted to line and shape? Her comment seemed rather…generic.

Of course, it turned out that the internationally renowned art historian knew what she was talking about. The black and white Picasso collection was mesmerizing enough, but placed against the swirls and loops and arches and cutouts of Frank Lloyd Wright’s masterpiece, it took on another level of meaning entirely. It was as if Wright and Picasso had returned from the dead to collaborate and create one enormous, harmonious work.

As I stood in the stark white spiraling halls of the Guggenheim, literally encircled by Picasso and Wright’s work, I got that glazy, teary-eyed feeling that comes from pure awe. On a recent trip to Colorado, my husband got the same glazy, teary-eyed feeling from the Rocky Mountains. I found the mountains beautiful (I’m not a monster), but I didn’t get that telltale ache in my gut. Last Thursday, though, I experienced my own version of my husband’s Rocky Mountain moment: utter reverence for the astonishing beauty of that which is man-made.

PICASSO BLACK AND WHITE is on exhibit at the Soloman R. Guggenheim Museum through January 13th. 1071 Fifth Avenue at 89th Street. Saturday nights are “Pay What You Wish” nights (5:45 – 7:45 PM).

 

 

 

by:

Posted & filed under Arts & Entertainment, General, Humor.

I have two good things to report:

  1. It’s fall.
  2. I got a radio.

Considering the fact that I’ve always wanted to be the type of person who wears oversized wool sweaters and listens to NPR, I’ve made quite a dent in my bucket list.

I can take no credit, of course, for the weather. Summer in New York is—quite simply—disgusting. Every August, I find myself on the verge of a humidity-induced mental breakdown. Then September comes, the temperature drops, and I forget my summer anguish the way new mothers forget the pain of childbirth when their cooing infant is placed in their arms. New York in fall is my cooing babe.

I can and do, however, take full credit for the radio. I’ve wanted one for ages, but each time I broached the subject, my husband would snort and shake like an irritated pony. “For God’s sakes Woman,” he’d say, “why do we need a radio when we have a laptop, a desktop, a stereo, an iPod, and an iPhone?”

Well, here’s why:

  1. Though the laptop is grand, its volume is crap. I can carry it with me to the kitchen, but as soon as I start chopping an onion or rinsing a head of lettuce, I can’t hear a thing. (I neglected to mention that the NPR/wool sweater girl also chops lots of onions and washes lots of lettuce.)
  2. The desktop is a temperamental beast that I avoid at all costs. You turn it on, you wait. The screen fills with numbers and codes, you wait. You hit F1, you wait.  You enter a password, you wait. To put this in perspective, I’ll share another fantasy: me buttering toast while listening to Morning Edition and then dashing out the door in a pair of stylish rain boots. It takes five minutes to make the toast. It takes six to turn on the computer.
  3. The stereo is good for many things, but it doesn’t have an antenna. It provides audio for TV, DVDs, CDs, iTunes, YouTube, vimeo, Flip videos, and Netflix, but AM and FM are a no-go. I can enjoy Double Rainbow in surround sound, but I can’t listen to Car Talk.
  4. As for the iPod, the only way to listen to radio on that is to download programs that have already aired. The sweater-girl is obviously nothing if not up-to-date with her current events.
  5. And finally, the iPhone, which is my husband’s and I’m not allowed to touch. (That’s a total lie—I’m allowed to play Bejeweled if I ask nicely and promise not mess up his scores.)

So, two weeks ago, after work, without telling a soul, I snuck off to Best Buy and bought a Philips combination radio, alarm clock, and iPhone dock. I thought that final feature would help smooth things over when I got home. It did.

My new radio turns on when I press the power button. I programmed the time and exactly one station all by myself. And yesterday, I wore a sweater.

by:

Posted & filed under Arts & Entertainment.

Last week, I found myself concurrently reading two books by two different men named Hedges. I found the coincidence extraordinary.

1. Peter Hedges, The Heights

If you are one of my regular readers, you may recall that before my illustrious career as a writer, I dabbled in the theatre. My undergraduate degree is, in fact, in acting, and I had to perform two monologues for the faculty before gaining admission to the Syracuse University Department of Drama. At seventeen, with a painful haircut and an even more painful compulsion to be a star, I spent months pleading “Is Brutus sick?” in preparation for the audition (Portia, Julius Caesar).

With my classical selection in the bag, it was time to focus on my contemporary piece, and I was lucky enough to stumble upon an absolute treasure: a one-woman show called The Valerie of Now from which I excerpted a 2-minute chunk. The story is that of of a 12-year-old girl (Valerie) who both laments and rejoices over the fact that she just got her first period. She cries, she screams, she sings (it ends with a rousing rendition of “I am Woman, Hear me Roar”). It was perfect; no monologue had ever shown such range. Plus, with the aforementioned haircut, I really could pass for 12.

The Valerie of Now was written by Peter Hedges who, at the time, was best known for his novel What’s Eating Gilbert Grape. I had never read the book, but like all good teenagers of the 90s, I’d seen the film and I liked it. Since then, Hedges has written and/or directed several other films, including About a BoyPieces of AprilThe Odd Life of Timothy Green.

Though Hedges works mostly in film, he recently published another novel called The Heights, which sat front and center at my local bookstore for months. The title refers to Brooklyn Heights, the neighborhood adjacent to mine, and Hedges, as it turns out, lives right down the street. It was the perfect storm: a book about where I live, by a man who not only shops at the same Trader Joe’s, but who was responsible for my undergraduate education. I had to read it.

I regret to report that The Heights is no Valerie of Now. The great thing about The Valerie of Now is that there is no subtext whatsoever and that, combined with the humor, sets the stage for an outrageous romp. There is also no subtext in The Heights, but neither is the book very funny. It’s a domestic tale about a couple with some vanilla marital issues, and Hedges sticks close to the surface. If an author’s not going to do a little digging into the human condition, than he or she really needs compensate with something else: humor, suspense, adventure, historical accuracy, whatever. The Heights did none of these things.

2. Chris Hedges, War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning

I have recently, against my better judgment, joined a book club. I am skeptical of things like book clubs—particularly when they are comprised of all women, as this one is—in the same way that I am skeptical of jewelry parties, sex toy nights, and the Red Hat Society. Too many women in one room, who aren’t really close enough to make it feel worthwhile. My standards for girl-time are high: the last time I saw my two best friends, we spent hours wedged together in a hotel room bathtub in Atlantic City in our bathing suits, drinking champagne and vodka, and alternately laughing, crying, and sending prank texts. With nights like that, white wine and giggles fall flat.

I was invited into this new book club, however, by a woman for whom I have enormous respect and affection, and so I agreed to participate. It was through the club that I came into contact with my second Hedges book: War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning by Pulitzer Prize-winning war correspondent Chris Hedges. I was happy with the choice—no Sweet Potato Queen or Ya-Ya Sisterhood for these ladies!

Chris Hedges writes with seductive clarity and authority. I found such beauty in his analysis of war—unpeeling layer after layer of the compulsion that drives us into combat. He writes as a journalist, but also as a raw, damaged man who has witnessed first-hand the worst conflicts of our time. I found the book oddly uplifting: war is horrific, yes, but horror is part of life, and life is sublime. We gather heightened snatches of meaning in life’s most atrocious moments, and thus we are able to endure them.

by:

Posted & filed under Arts & Entertainment, Getting Away.

The extent of my exposure to Stephen King includes:

1) Catching an accidental glimpse of the cover of Pet Cemetery when I was five and getting so freaked out by the screeching, skeletal cat that for years I took pains to stay several feet away from the book, which always seemed to pop up (mysteriously!) in different places around the house.

2) Watching It with my three best girlfriends at a sleepover in high-school and all of us growing increasingly befuddled as we tried to piece together, for an hour and a half, what we believed was some sophisticated, avant-garde abstraction until at last the credits rolled, and we realized that we’d just watched the latter half of a 2-part VHS rental and had missed the entire beginning of the film.

3) Appearing—along with nearly every other person in the county—as an extra in the movie version of Thinner (which happened to shoot an elaborate carnival scene in my hometown of Belfast, Maine for two consecutive November nights when I was sixteen), and using the ensuing chaos as an opportunity to illicitly snuggle with my boyfriend in his car between takes.

My fragmented experiences, coupled with the fact that I haven’t read a single one of his books, might suggest that I’m not the type to go out of my way for a King-sized scare. Oh how wrong you are!

Last weekend, my husband and I traveled to Vail, Colorado for a wedding and then spent a few days in a town called Estes Park checking out the hiking and the wildlife. Estes Park is home to Rocky Mountain National Park, as well as (who knew?) The Stanley Hotel—aka the inspiration behind The Shining.

Riding into Estes Park in our rented mini-van (they were out of every other type of vehicle at the Dollar Rent-A-Car), the behemoth white hotel loomed on a lone cliff, beckoning like death’s bright light. “Oh please, please, please can we go?” I begged. Considering the fact that the hotel also boasted the finest restaurant in town, my husband made dinner reservations for the following night.

Back in our un-haunted mountain chalet, we prepped accordingly. The proprietors of our inn kept a shelf of DVDs for their guests, among them (hooray!) Kubrick’s version of The Shining. I had seen The Shining before, but never from beginning to end, and never all in one sitting. It is really an extraordinary film (although I still fell asleep halfway through and had to watch the rest in the morning). As we hiked in quiet solitude, I pondered Kubrick’s camera direction, and could only think of three other films I’ve seen that seem to reach that level of frame-to-frame genius: Citizen Kane and Hitchcock’s Rear Window and Rope.

By the time we were done with that day’s activities, I was fired up to a new level. I wanted more than just dinner: “Please, please, please can we also go on the ghost tour?”

For $15 per person, you can get the historical paranormal tour of The Stanley, and my husband and I got the last two slots of the day. Let me digress for a minute about organized ghost tours: I took one in London when I was in college that was spectacular. The guide took us down the most fabulous little alleyways and cobblestone crevices and told long, detail-oriented stories about history and politics and architecture while seamlessly interweaving unexplained British phenomenon. Because the tour was so good, and not at all cheesy, I came to believe that all ghost tours would be held to that standard. I can’t stress enough that this is not the case, though I have not yet lost hope that I will one day find another that actually satisfies. The Stanley ghost tour, sadly, was not it.

I did, however, learn a little bit about Shining history. Apparently, Stephen King and his wife stayed at The Stanley for one night in the mid-70s in a supposedly-haunted room, during which King had a vision of two creepy twin girls standing in the hallway. (NOTE: This is what we learned on the tour. The story differs slightly on Wikipedia). This incident inspired the novel, which King set in a fictional version of The Stanley called The Overlook. When Kubrik got the rights to make the film, he felt that the Stanley was not remote enough to properly creep us out, and so he filmed his exteriors at Timberline Lodge in Mount Hood, Oregon. King was allegedly dissatisfied with Kubrick’s interpretation, and wrote a teleplay for a miniseries version that aired on ABC in 1997. The televised version was, in fact, filmed at The Stanley.

I never saw the miniseries, though I must say I am curious enough to check it out. I also wouldn’t mind taking a look at the Timberline Lodge if I were in the area. My real fascination with the entire topic though, can be boiled down to Kubrick’s insane manipulation of the camera, a rush that no tour—or hotel—can recreate.

The Stanley Hotel, Estes Park, Colorado

P.S. Unlike the tour, the food was out of this world. If you find yourself in Estes Park, be sure to stop by for a meal.

by:

Posted & filed under Arts & Entertainment.

When I was a child, my best friend Beth and I loved to play a game called Teenagers. The object of the game was to act like teenagers and involved props (lip-gloss, pocketbooks). Beth always wanted her alter-ego to be nineteen, but I felt there was something brassy and garish about that number. For me, ‘nineteen’ conjured girls with streaked hair and lazy vowels and drooping bra straps; I much preferred eighteen, an age that evoked summer sailing classes and white cable-knit sweaters and dazzling teeth. In other words, ‘eighteen’ was classy.

My fascination with the trappings of class followed me into adulthood—what it is, who’s got it, who wants it, who has it and nothing else, and who has everything but. I’ll take a good exploration of class in any form, from The House of Mirth’s Lily Bart to Gossip Girl’s Lily Bass, from Theodore Dreiser’s Sister Carrie to Andy Cohen’s The Real Housewives of New York. Recently, I was lucky enough to stumble upon two additional offerings: Snobs, a novel by Downton Abby creator Julian Fellowes, and The Queen of Versailles, a documentary by filmmaker Lauren Greenfield.

I found Snobs at Housing Works on West 10th Street (a shop that donates 100% of its proceeds to AIDS and homeless outreach and one of the classiest stores in town). I adored Fellowes’ film Gosford Park, and I enjoy (along with the rest of the world) a nice Sunday night on the couch with Downton Abby. I was not, however, aware that Fellowes was also a novelist. It turns out that he’s written two books—Snobs, published in 2004, and Past Imperfect in 2009. It was the title and cover of Snobs, though, that caught my eye before I even noticed the author. Despite the fact that it is written by a man, the book was clearly being marketed as chick-lit. As a genre, chick-lit roughly cranks out one worthy read for every hundred clunkers, and find I’m always on the prowl for that elusive one percent. (Helen Fielding’s original Bridget Jones’ Diary falls into that category. Roll your eyes if you want, but that book is an absolute gem—even Salman Rushdie’s a fan).

Marketing aside, Snobs is not really chick-lit. It is a modern-day comedy of manners, a Downton Abby eighty years post-Titanic. The beginning of the novel reads like Genesis, a litany of who begat who in the world of the titled class. The main plot revolves around a pretty woman of average means and position who suddenly finds herself having to choose between the aristocracy and the nouveau riche. The nouveau riche are certainly more fun, but the aristocracy get to peer down their collective nose. What’s a girl to do?

The interesting thing about Snobs is that, for a novel with such a frothy premise, it’s not as bubbly as one might expect. It is, particularly in the second half, more subtle and moody than the cover would have you believe. It becomes a bit of a slog after a while, partially because Julian Fellowes excels at dialogue but not necessarily narrative, and partially because it really is a slog to sort through the unending complexities and silliness of class. The heroine begins to weary of the whole thing, and the reader feels her weariness.

If Snobs leaves you a bit exhausted, The Queen of Versailles leaves you a bit squeamish. It chronicles the rise and fall of billionaire businessman David Siegel and his ex-beauty pageant wife, Jackie. Siegel made his fortune as the founder and president of Westgate Resorts, the largest privately owned timeshare company in the world. At the start of the film, David and Jackie are in the process of building their dream home: a 90,000 square foot house in Orlando, FL that is modeled after the Palace of Versailles. They didn’t set out to build the largest house in America, but when they added ten kitchens, an indoor ice-skating rink, and a sushi bar to the blueprints, it became just that.

About a third of the way into the film, however, the 2008 financial crisis rears its head (a twist that Lauren Greenfield didn’t plan for but stuck around to capture). Suddenly, the Siegels don’t have enough cash to continue construction on Versailles, and they must (at least for the time being) remain in their old 26,000 square foot mansion and downsize from nineteen household staffers to three.

Jackie and David, both from humble backgrounds, are caricatures of every vulgar cliché the phrase ‘nouveau riche’ conjures. Jackie, as the title suggests, is the real protagonist of the film, and she has Coco-T style fake breasts and dozens of oil paintings of herself wearing tiaras. She’s tacky, misguided, and ignorant, but lest you judge too quickly, she’s also undeniably warm. Despite her army of nannies, she exhibits the kind of hands-on, goofy love for her kids that can only be described as down-to-earth. She tries, for instance, to save her niece’s starving pet lizard by running off to the kitchen for a slice of lunchmeat. She spends half of the film with her hair in an oh-so-dreadful scrunchie, and her best girlfriend is missing a few teeth. She is, quite simply, the antithesis of a snob.

Despite their money, the Siegels lives are not enviable, which is why the movie makes you squirm. You feel bad for Jackie, not because of the crash and the cutbacks, but because her husband is a jerk and lousy father, and she’s not self-assured or self-aware enough to do anything about it. The real question this film poses is not how America could produce such incredible greed, but how America could produce a woman with so little capacity for critical thought.

by:

Posted & filed under Eating & Drinking, Humor.

When I took stock of my schedule last week, I was pleased to note that the first installation of my new blog “Almost Cultured” would coincide with a truly refined and urbane experience: dinner at Café Boulud.

My husband and I were in possession of a $100 gift certificate to Café Boulud, and—since Monday was my birthday—we had a good reason to cash it in. The gift certificate was a wedding present from Nick’s Uncle Tim, the man who also officiated the ceremony. Uncle Tim is one of those rare individuals who are both spiritual and sarcastic, and was thus the perfect person for the job. The wedding present we got from him and his husband was a reflection of how fun they are: lunch for two at Café Boulud with actor Peter Sarsgaard. It was something they had bid on at a charity auction, with Peter Sarsgaard donating his time to whatever the cause.

A year passed before my husband and I got around to emailing Peter Sarsgaard’s assistant, who told us that she had changed jobs long ago. A few months later, we got in touch with a second assistant who told us that Peter’s schedule was now too full to honor such an old commitment. The auction refunded the money, but we still got to keep the $100 Café Boulud gift card. (Secretly, I was pleased. I think Peter Sarsgaard is a fantastic actor, but what would I say to him? He doesn’t seem the type to want to dish on bad celebrity behavior.)

Another year passed before we got around to making the reservation: August 27th at 7 PM: the night of my 33rd birthday.

Here is a little background on Café Boulud: Chef Daniel Boulud is easily one of the most celebrated in the world. His premier restaurant, Daniel, is one of only ten in the country with a 3-star Michelin rating, the highest possible rank (there are a total of 106 restaurants in the world with three Michelin stars, the large majority of which are in Japan and France). Café Boulud is Daniel’s less-celebrated kid brother, but it’s still impressive (think Lynn vs. Vanessa Redgrave). It is also Michelin-rated, though it has one star as opposed to three.

I spent the week before my birthday crafting the first “Almost Cultured” in my head: a witty breakdown of each Boulud dish, Top-Chef style; a riff on wine-pairing; a rallying defense of the vegetarian’s right to enjoy the world’s best restaurants (I refuse to let the fact that my husband and I don’t eat meat limit our cultural experiences).

On Monday, I got a birthday manicure and pedicure—bright red nails to match what would be bright red lipstick and a 1940s-inspired look, which I was also crafting in my head. At 5 PM, my husband called me from work. It makes more sense for me to meet you there, he said. This was a bit of gloomy foreshadowing: Who wants to take a subway from Brooklyn to a romantic Upper East Side restaurant in a 1940s-inspired look all alone?

The real problem, however, was that I hadn’t yet found the gift certificate. I looked though desk drawers and dresser drawers, boxes of postcards and stacks of old mortgage statements, take-out menus and ticket stubs. At 5:30, I called my husband back and told him the news. “Also, I’m very cranky,” I said. He rushed right home.

By the time my husband walked in the door, I was sprawled on the couch, irritated with everything. He took the reigns and made an emergency executive decision: we would go out to eat in our own neighborhood. I put on the dress that I wear to work nearly every day, and we walked over to Frankie’s 457, an Italian restaurant that we’d been meaning to try. Neither of us liked the meal, but we both liked the wine. On the way home we stopped at the dessert-and-pork-bun shop Momofuku Milk Bar, where I got “birthday cake truffles,” a lovely way of saying “spheres of cookie dough the size of golf balls.”

I am happy to report that they were delicious.

by:

Posted & filed under General.

Men as socks.

Some men are argyles.

Safe socks.

This column socks.

Thus begins Carrie’s brainstorming in the second episode of the fifth season, Unoriginal Sin. “I’m scraping the bottom of the barrel here, ladies,” she says. “Last week, I wrote about my search for the perfect French fry.”

I am both sorry and relieved to say that I feel the same way. You may have noticed my silence for the past 4 weeks. This was not some lackadaisical hiatus; this was a tortured month of Fridays, each one creeping up and then flying by, my psyche haunted by half-baked ideas and my husband’s ridiculous faith in everything I do (“But honey, think of your fans!”).

When I began Almost Carrie, my goal was to post once a week for three months. When three months rolled around, I wanted to keep going for six, and after six, I was jonesing for a year. That’s the thing about blogging—it’s addictive, especially when you start looking at the numbers. Back in August of 2011, eight people read the post Almost Carrie: The Pilot. Skip to July 19th of this year and the 1,500 hits I got for Almost Carrie: Carole Radziwill and the Future of Housewives. (Full disclosure: this is a totally inflated number and not at all indicative of a regular week. RHONY star Aviva Drescher, bless her heart, tweeted a link to that piece and things ended up getting K-RAY-ZEE!)

I was also nothing if not diligent. On a trip to Scotland last September, my husband spent the morning island-hopping and seal-watching while I stayed behind and wrote my blog in the lobby of the B & B. On Thanksgiving Day, with the family making merry downstairs, I locked myself in my four-year-old cousin’s room and penned sexual innuendo from inside the pile of stuffed animals that constitutes her bed. I took the week off between Christmas and New Year’s, but then I was right back on the horse. I would not stop until I hit 52 posts. This is number 43.

Now, however, despite this previous exuberance, I’m ready to stop. I am, for better or for worse, absolutely sick of trying to find ways to relate my life to Sex and the City each week. If I were Truly Carrie instead of Almost Carrie, I’d be getting paid for my work, and surely that would be enough to get me over the hump. But Almost Carrie’s payment is in the form of personal gratification, and so it seems silly to continue when I no longer feel personally gratified. Throw my father’s death into the mix and the inevitable overhaul of one’s priorities that comes with that kind of loss, and you start to see why I’m shying away from writing anything that doesn’t totally float my boat.

That said, I’ve come to love blogging. I’m greedy for the high of publishing something with one little click—it makes waiting for rejections from Ploughshares and Alaskan Quarterly that much more bearable.

So: I will put Almost Carrie to bed (Ha! Still got it!) but will continue to blog. As for a topic? Well, I considered doing a week-by-week, Joan Didion-style analysis of grief, but that seemed a bit cruel (I should consider my readers at least a little). Another idea, and one that is much more user-friendly, is to write about arts and culture. I have a decent knowledge of literature, television, film, and theatre; a basic working knowledge of visual arts and food; and no knowledge whatsoever of music, opera, or dance. I think the disparity could be fun. My plan is to couple cultural critiques with goofy stories and anecdotes from my life, so for those of you who only read Almost Carrie for the dirt on my marriage and my in-laws, don’t fret.

I want to make it clear one last time, in spite of my exhaustion with everything Carrie-related (December will mark my eighth year as a tour guide), that I have an enormous place in my heart for the Sex and the City. There is no need, at this point, to recap my argument for its substantial contribution to society—you’ve heard it before. Great shows, though, try to go out on a high note, and I want to do the same. So adieu, my loyal Almost Carrie readers. Thank-you for your time this past year. I hope that at least some of you will follow me down this road. Also: if I decide to resurface and make some bullshit “Almost Carrie: The Movie” in a few years, feel free to tear it to pieces.

P.S. My husband suggested the title “Almost Cultured” for my next column. I kind of love it. Thoughts?

Emily Sproch is a writer and a Sex and the City tour guide. Each Friday, she chronicles the fine line between reality and fiction in her column “Almost Carrie.”